VOLUME XXVIII, NUMBER 2                                                                                                         EASTER, 2008
- Proclaiming the Catholic Faith through the beauty of the Anglican Liturgy -

 


A WORD OUT OF THE ORDINARY

 

Dear Friends,

 

When our dear Lord cried out from the Cross, "It is finished!" these were words of victory, not defeat. Jesus came to save you from your sins. He fulfilled in His Person and Work every requirement of the Old Testament Law. He offered Himself as Priest and Victim upon the Cross to pay the price of sin. He has finished the work of salvation His Father gave Him to do. His is the victory over the world, the flesh and the devil.

 

St. Peter says, "Christ died, the Just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God." The veil in the temple was rent asunder showing that through His precious blood, Christ is the Way to the Father. You can not enter the Presence of God trusting in your own righteousness, but in His great mercy 'under the blood of the Lamb.'

 

The teaching of the Old Testament is that without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin. The Lord did not deal with your sin by simply setting it aside, saying everything is alright. He sent His Son into the world to make the acceptable sacrifice for sin. "There was no other good enough / To pay the price of sin, / He only could unlock the gate / Of heaven, and let us in." None can go unto the Father but through His blood.

 

In the Sixth chapter of St. John's Gospel our Lord speaks most plainly that you must eat His flesh and drink His blood to have His life in you. "Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them." Some found this to be a hard saying and they deserted Him. In the Upper Room our Lord instituted the new covenant in His Body and Blood so that you can feed on Him and have His life in you.

 

The word Lent speaks to the lengthening of daylight as Spring draws nigh. Spring is the renewal of the earth after the time of death of Winter. It is nature's way of proclaiming the blessed hope of the glorious resurrection of our Lord on the third day according to the Scriptures. Easter is the Spring of Souls from the prison of sin, for Jesus as a sun has risen and the Winter of your sins is flying. Those who believe on Jesus have His life to raise them up from sin and death in newness of life to live forever with the Lord.

 

We trust that you will have a most Blessed Easter and be filled with the confidence that "Now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept." Because He lives, you, too, will live as you will be glorified together with Him. May the words of Jesus' victory become your words of blessed assurance. "It is finished!"

 

Yours in that Blessed Hope,

 

Faithfully in Christ,

Prayer for the Increase of the Ministry

O Almighty God, look mercifully upon the world which thou hast redeemed by the blood of thy dear Son, and incline the hearts of many to dedicate themselves to the Sacred Ministry of thy Church; through the same thy Son Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Ghost, One God, world without end. Amen.

 
 


 

 

 

 

 

The Election of The Rt Rev’d Leo J Michael   

 Bishop Ordinary of the Diocese of the Holy Trinity and Great Plains

 

The Enthronement Service will be held on Thursday, June 12, during the Annual Synod of the diocese

Which will be held at Saint Joseph of Glastonbury Church, Wichita, KS

 

"Whosoever shall be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic Faith. Which Faith, except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without dot he will perish everlastingly."                          - Saint Athanasius

 

 
 

 

 

 

 


HOW DO WE WORSHIP THE LORD?

 

We offer incense at the beginning of the Mass and at the offering of the oblation, and everything and ever person is symbolically made fragrant as the censer is swung to each person and thing in turn. That represents the fitting preparation of the place and the people before holy acts are done and holy things are taken and holy mysteries are handled. When the oblation is placed upon the Altar every thing and every person is censed and the incense is swung to send a cloud of fragrance over the people; in that, I think, is a thought that is well to grip and take away with you.

 

When the incense is swung over the people it represents the truth that a Christian life should be a fragrant thing; when you go out of church you ought to take with you the fragrance of a Christian life. The presence of a Christian in home or street or work should be like the fragrant swing of the censer leaving behind an atmosphere that is touched with heavenly values. I once heard some one say that a person’s cat ought to know if its owner is a Christian. I am quite certain the people in the same street ought to know, and that there ought to go out with the fragrance of our Christian life and fellowship and worship, so that men have knowledge that we have been with Jesus.

 

Again, we offer incense when the Blessed Sacrament is elevated at the Mass, for that is our supreme moment of prayer, as the perfect offering is made and the presence e of angels and archangels and the company of heaven is recognized, so we add to our singing our silence, and to our silence the symbolic offering of the fragrant incense.

 

Pp 60-61, The Symbolism of the Sanctuary, 1927/1943, A. R. Mowbray & Co. Ltd., London. This book contains the Lenten sermon notes of Father Andrew who was one-time pastor in the three churches of St. Philip’s, Plaistow, St. Saviour’s, Eastourne, and St. Luke’s, Kingston, England.

 

 

THE APOSTOLIC CANONS

 

THE SEVEN OECUMENICAL COUNCILS OF THE UNDIVIDED CHURCH

  

TREE OF FAITH LETTERS

 

These are a detailed course of instruction in the Faith set forth in a series of Letters written, where possible, at weekly intervals. The writing of these letters provided an opportunity to demonstrate the way in which the Faith revealed in the Holy Scriptures has been clarified by the Fathers in the face of false interpretations and the intrusion of alien teachings. These Letters were written to provide a sufficient guide so that the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments begin to come alive in the way the Fathers experienced them. This is an invitation to a fresh discovery of the spiritual riches of the Catholic Church.

 

 

SOME THOUGHTS ON GOOD SHEPHERD SUNDAY

by Bp. Leo Michael

What a day to celebrate the ordination, when we shall be making of John Slavin a shepherd through the sacrament of the Holy Orders, when we hear again the words of our Lord “I am the Good Shepherd and I lay down my life for my sheep”. In today’s gospel Jesus articulates what a shepherd should be and who he should not be: He needs to be a Good shepherd and not a hireling. In the person of our Lord, the shepherd is a GOOD Shepherd and also the lamb that is sacrificed. A shepherd as a lamb sounds like an oxymoron. Contradictory as it may seem in its denotation, verily the shepherd becomes the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world.

The shepherd is the one who has a unique relationship with his sheep. The sheep know him and follow him and they are certain that he will lead them to verdant pasture. Psalm 21 addresses the Lord as our shepherd and as sheep there is nothing we shall lack. Fresh and green are the pastures where he gives me repose, near restful waters he leads me to revive my drooping spirit. He will guide me along what he knows to be right: if I walk in the darkness no evil shall I fear. I know that he will be there with his crook and with his staff.

Personally I have had some experience as shepherd boy in my early childhood days. My mom who worked as a nurse in a government hospital, would ask us to graze our sheep and cows. It was a steep hillside with thorny bushes and rocks. I was seven or eight year old then, and the landscape looked huge for me then. I had to make sure that the sheep did not slip and fall and I had to bleat to mimic them at times to get their response, if I lost sight of them. At times, pretending to be a young one, I would bleat and the lambs would also respond. I needed to make sure that they all reached their pen. It was a small house that we lived in and the pen was just next to our house. Any little noise would wake us up. When they give birth to the young ones, we would stay awake at night to make sure that the birthing was right. What a joy it was to see them when they were born.

Our Lord applies this example of his times, an example of a shepherd that every one of his audience was familiar with. He is the Great and Good Shepherd, who is not a hireling. He will not run away at the face of danger, because his sheep is in danger. He would fight and defend his sheep till they are secure. Simply put, someone can go only over his dead body to steal his sheep.

What is great about this Good Shepherd is that He is God the Shepherd and true enough He lay down his life for his sheep. In this act of sacrifice, he was not only the shepherd, but the sheep, the lamb, the victim that was sacrificed. Call to priesthood, is just the beginning of a struggle in living out the calling. It could be martyrdom, but in our day and age it is a bloodless one. If anyone thought wearing this collar is going to command respect, they are mistaken. If anyone taught and thought, that the ordination to the holy orders can be recalled at will, they make mockery of such a holy estate and persist in their foolhardiness, for they have no clue of what it calls one for. The role of a shepherd can never ever be compromised, sidelined, bought off, having other preferential option, not even the secular job that we have for livelihood, for it’s a call from above: Feed my lamb, feed my sheep. Only if they feared their conscience and remembered the day they made their vows to the Lord on the day of their ordination, there will be so much of integrity and incessant work for God’s glory and His Kingdom. The Lord refers to the hireling; they are the ones only concerned about their welfare, their benefits, and their retirement. Matthew Henry very aptly comments on this concept of a 'hireling', “How basely the hireling deserts his post; when he sees the wolf coming, though then there is most need of him, he leaves the sheep and flees. Note, those who mind their safety more than their duty are an easy prey to Satan's temptations. (b.) How fatal the consequences are! the hireling fancies the sheep may look to themselves, but it does not prove so: the wolf catches them, and scatters the sheep, and woeful havoc is made of the flock, which will all be charged upon the treacherous shepherd. The blood of perishing souls is required at the hand of the careless watchmen. “

The call to the Holy Orders is a call from God to take care of the souls that are very dear to Him. And the accountability is going to be grave on the Day of Judgment, make no mistake about it. And our process of discerning the vocation is through prayers and the internal disposition of the candidate and of course one’s seminary training coupled with their on the job training in a pastoral setting. The twelve apostles sat and learnt at the school of Jesus. They heard him speak and teach, saw him do great works and saw his zeal for the poor and the down trodden. At the synagogue, Jesus got up and read the following: "The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, Because He anointed Me to preach the gospel to the poor. He has sent Me to proclaim release to the captives, and recovery of sight to the blind, To set free those who are downtrodden, to proclaim the favorable year of the Lord.' And He closed the book, and gave it back to the attendant, and sat down; and the eyes of all in the synagogue were fixed upon Him. And He began to say to them, ‘Today this Scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing.'"

Resonating the very words of our Lord in the synagogue, for his ordination motto, Deacon John has chosen the Gospel of Matthew Chapter 10 verse 8 "Freely ye have received, Freely Give" He told me, “I prayed over this for a long time and I feel it sums up my calling well. I truly love working with those who have nothing, it is why I originally was drawn to the prison ministry and hospital chaplain.” We need to feel aglow with the zeal for His Kingdom and therein lies the call to be His heart, hands, eyes and feet.

It is a call to servitude. I believe that the washing of the feet is not confined to Maundy Thursday alone; in the case of every priest and deacon and bishop, we are called to serve. It is in giving that we receive. St. Francis of Assisi said so beautifully remembering the words of our Lord: the measure with which you will give is a measure in which you will receive. We wish Fr. John well and hope that he keeps his promise and vow that he will make in the assembly of this congregation and commit Himself to the cause of His sheep in the footsteps of the Good Shepherd.

 

Catholic or Protestant?

 

     These are two words within the English lexicon that are sorely misunderstood by most people.  This is due largely in part because of (believe it or not) World War II.  It was at this time that the military began to issue what has come to be known as “Dog Tags.”  These are the aluminum identification tags worn around the necks of all uniformed men and women of the American armed forces.  On these “dog tags” are an individual’s name, branch of service, blood type, etc.  Also included is the optional “religious preference.”  During World War II there were but two options: Catholic or Protestant.  The theory at this time was that if you were not Roman Catholic then you had to be Protestant.

    

   The word “Catholic” has its origins in the Greek language, but was adopted early on by the Church in the Latin speaking West.  This word simply means “throughout the whole,” i.e., universal.  The East used the word “Orthodox” to describe themselves, and this simply means, “right thinking,” i.e., traditional.  Up until 1054 AD the Catholic West and the Orthodox East were united as One Church (with the exception of a few temporary separations).  Naturally, the Catholics and the Orthodox claimed to possess the truth over their disagreement that lead to the split.  The Catholics maintained the Papacy, and the Orthodox settled matters of faith in councils attended by the Church’s bishops just as the Church had done prior to the schism. 

    

   The meaning of the word “Protestant” has its origins in the two Latin words pro and test.  Pro means “for” and test means word with an emphasis on truth; thus, the word “Protestant” is someone who is “for the true word.”

  

   So, back to the original question Catholic or Protestant Church? Catholic in the ancient and undivided understanding of the word. It is true that the Roman Catholic Church has a different understanding of the word “Catholic” today, but it is our firm belief that our use of the word “Catholic” is more accurate and more closely emulates those Christians that were first known as Catholics.  Protestant in that we, like all Christian peoples, seek the true Word of God.  Thus, we must say that we practice the Catholic Faith in its Anglican expression.

 

 

The Papal Claims Examined

from Catholic Principles

by The Revd Frank N. Westcott


It is a sad and most unfortunate fact, yet one which is easily capable of demonstration by any competent historian, that all along the ages, Rome’s interests have been advanced by forgeries and falsification of the Fathers; and that such interpolations are quoted with approval today, in Roman controversial books; and that it is not safe to accept patristic quotations in such books, without verifying them at first hand.


There are plenty of historic facts which are utterly inconsistent with the assumption that the supreme judicial and spiritual authority of the Church, has always been in the hands of the Bishops of Rome. For example: the first difficulty which required judicial action in the Apostolic Church, was settled by a council of the whole Church at Jerusalem, under the presidency, not of St. Peter, but of St. James, who pronounced sentence in his own name, without any regard to St. Peter.


When Victor, Bishop of Rome, AD 196, undertook to excommunicate the Asiatic Churches, because they disagreed with him about the time of the observance of Easter, he was rebuked by the other Bishops, including Irenaeus, and his excommunication was ignored, and had no effect whatever.


In the fourth century, the Council of Sardica allowed a condemned Bishop to appeal to
Rome for a new trial, not as a recognized right, but as conferring a privilege. This canon of Sardica, was misquoted by the Bishops of Rome as being a canon of the Council of Nice in a controversy with the African Bishops. But the latter consulted the Eastern Patriarchs, and, so discovering the misquotation, replied to the Patriarch of Rome through his legates, “We find it enacted in no council of the Fathers, that any person may be sent as legates of your holiness . . . . Do not therefore at the request of any, send your clergy as agents for you, lest we seem to introduce into the Church of Christ, the ambitious pride of the world.”


The great Arian heresy which denied the divinity of our Lord, was settled by the Nicene Council, which was called, not by the Pope, but by the Emperor Constantine. Hosius presided, and the heresy was finally refuted, not through the pronouncement of the Pope, but through the argument of Athanasius; while Pope Liberius himself became a heretic.


Then the heresy denying the divinity of the Holy Ghost, was settled at the Council of Constantinople in 381, at which the Nicene Creed was reaffirmed, and the sentences defining doctrine concerning the Holy Ghost added, and the Roman Bishop was not present either in person or through his legates. Meletius of Antioch presided at the council, and was succeeded by Gregory Nazianzen, Patriarch of Constantinople; and so in the settlement of the two greatest heresies, the authority of the Bishop of Rome counted for little or nothing; and it is interesting to note that the Bishops assembled in council at Constantinople in 381, in their Epistle to the Western Bishops assembled at Rome, called the Church of Jerusalem the “Mother of all Churches.”


Of course the most complete refutation of the Roman claim of supremacy has been the historic position of the four patriarchates of the Eastern Church, which have never acknowledged the claims of such universal jurisdiction, and yet were in communion with the patriarch of
Rome until the twelfth century.


The claims of supreme and spiritual jurisdiction over the whole Church, on the part of the Bishop of Rome, cannot stand the test of catholicity, and so become articles of faith, unless they have been acknowledged always, everywhere, and by all Catholics; and this we have shown to be historically incredible.


Roman Catholics are very fond of asserting that a visible Church must have a visible head; and that as there is no other Bishop who claims to be the head of the Church but the Pope of Rome, therefore he must be that head. We reply, that in the Holy Scriptures St. Paul asserts that Jesus Christ is the Head of the Church; and he nowhere recognizes any other head; though he constantly insists on the visible, organic nature of the Church itself. St. Augustine asserts the same fact, thus: “Since the whole Christ is made up of the head and the body, the head is our Saviour Himself, who suffered under Pontius Pilate, who now, after He has risen from the dead, sits at the right hand of God; but His body is the Church; not this Church, or that, but the Church scattered over all the world . . . . For the whole Church, made up of all the faithful, because all the faithful are members of Christ, has its head situate in the heavens which governs this body: though it is separated from their sight, yet it is bound to them by love.” Then again, it must be remembered that the greater part of the Catholic Church is made up of souls in
Paradise, and therefore is not visible to us; and Christ is the Head of the Church to them, as well as to us. To them He may be visible.


But supposing the visible Church must have a visible head: we reply, as a practical matter of fact, the universal episcopate assembled in general council was from the first regarded as the head of the Church; the ultimate source and seat of authority, to which the Bishop of Rome himself was always subject: as is proved by the fact, that the universal episcopate settled heresies, defined the Faith, and deposed Popes who were themselves heretics, and excommunicated them. Gregory the Great, as we have seen, expressly repudiated the title of "universal Bishop” which he most certainly would not have done, if he had considered himself the “head of the Church,” in the modern Roman sense.


It makes a neat turn of an argument to say that the visible Church must have a visible head; and then to set forth the Pope as that head; but after all, it is merely a question of historic fact, and history points to the universal Episcopate as the head, and not to the Pope of Rome. If the Pope of Rome is the head of the Church, then when the Pope dies, apparently the Church has no head, and remains a headless monster, perhaps for several months, until another Pope is elected and enthroned. Surely this is a curious condition of things, that the Church should be continually sloughing off its head, and growing another, every generation or so; so that every little while it has no head at all. The collective episcopate does not die; but lives on from age to age, and as the head of the Church, is abiding and permanent.


The whole growth of the papal claims may be summarized by four words: Primacy, Supremacy, Sovereignty, and Infallibility. The Primacy of Rome, Anglicans admit to be lawful; not as of divine appointment, but as a matter of precedence and executive convenience, originating from the prominence of the Imperial city. The Supremacy of Rome, Anglicans reject, as disturbing the original balance of power defined by the general councils and canon law of the Church. The Sovereignty of Rome, Anglicans repudiate, as mere secular Imperialism transferred to the Church, from the State. The Infallibility of the Roman pontiffs, the Anglican Church denies, as an assumption by one man in the Church of a power, or faculty, conferred by our Lord on the Church as a whole. From what has been said, it seems evident that there is no scriptural evidence that St. Peter was appointed supreme head of the Church by our Lord, and that there is no historical evidence of any sort which proves that St. Peter ever attempted to transfer any authority, peculiar to himself to the Bishops of Rome; and that what the early Church conceded to the Patriarch of Rome, was a primacy of honor among equals, and not a supremacy of authority, by divine appointment.

 

 

 

THE MARIAN DOCTRINES

 

Here is a list of the Marian doctrines which belong to the Faith of the Undivided Catholic Church to which our Constitution and the Solemn Declaration commit us.

In the case of the first four, we name the Ecumenical Councils which proclaimed those doctrines.

1) That Mary is rightly called the Mother of God - Theotokos

Ephesus Canon 1

2) That Mary is 'Ever-Virgin' - Perpetual Virginity

Constantinople II Capitual 2

3) That Mary is without sin

Nicea II Decree

4) That Mary has been Glorified - Her Assumption or Dormition

Constantinople II 

(As accepted in the Undivided Church, this means that Mary, as a whole human being, has been taken into heaven, and that she already shares in the General Resurrection of the body - one step ahead of us.

King Alfred the Great described the Assumption as the greatest of Our Lady's Feasts.)

5) That Mary is an intercessor, and that we may seek her prayers 

(liturgical sources)

 

The Scriptural Rosary

 

Visit The Holy Catholic Church - Anglican Rite

Visit The Diocese of the Resurrection (HCC-AR)

Visit The Pro-Cathedral Church of the Incarnation, QuakertownPA

 

 

The purpose of The Holy Catholic Church (Anglican Rite)  is to restore and perpetuate the Faith, Order, Worship and Witness  of Western  Orthodox-Catholic Christianity as it existed in the English Church from the time it arrived on the shores of Britain in the First Century, to the time of the Great Schism in 1054 (or the Norman Conquest of 1066), and as set forth by the "ancient catholic bishops and doctors," and especially as defined by all Seven Ecumenical Councils of the undivided Church.

WE ARE NOT JUST ANOTHER "CONTINUING ANGLICAN" JURISDICTION WE ARE CONTINUING CATHOLICS.

 

We shall continue to witness to Christ's Good News and maintain our vision of a truly Catholic Church, expressing that Catholicism in an Anglican way. This is not the same as expressing Anglicanism in a Catholic way. We are Anglican Rite Catholics, not Comprehensive Anglicans.